RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 29 14:48:00 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/111123.html

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:46 +0200
DasIch <dasdasich at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
> allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
> which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
> future.

"Including" is quite vague. pybench is "included" in the suite of
benchmarks at hg.python.org, but that doesn't mean it is given any
particular importance: you can select whichever benchmarks you want to
run when "perf.py" is executed (there are even several predefined
benchmark groups, none of which pybench is a member IIRC).

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/111123.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite