Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/111121.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
future.

This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results from this
particular benchmark and it negatively affects the performance data as
a whole.

The same applies to several Unladen Swallow microbenchmarks such as
bm_call_method_*, bm_call_simple and bm_unpack_sequence.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal for a common benchmark suite
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4