On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Mark Shannon wrote: > >> NaN does not have to be a float or a Decimal. >> Perhaps it should have its own class. > > Perhaps, but that wouldn't solve anything on its own. If > this new class compares reflexively, then it still violates > IEE754. Conversely, existing NaNs could be made to compare > reflexively without making them a new class. And 3rd party NaNs can still do whatever the heck they want :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4