RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 28 06:57:22 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110998.html

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
> [1] Okay, that's a lie. I'm sure that persistent minority would *love* to
> have NaN == NaN, because that would make their (ab)use of NaNs easier to
> work with.

Too bad, because that won't change. :-) I agree that this is abuse of
NaNs and shouldn't be encouraged.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110998.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyObject_RichCompareBool identity shortcut