Hi, > If not, next developer tring to merge will find some other > unrelated code to merge, and she doesn't have the context knowledge to > know what to do :-). Here’s a useful tip: instead of merging pulled changesets with your branch, do the reverse. That is: $ hg pull $ hg heads . # get only heads for the checked-out branch $ hg up other-head $ hg merge Now instead of merging unknown code into your checkout, you will merge the code added by your unpushed changesets to the other code. If you’re using a three-way file merge tool, it is your code that will be in the “other” pane, not the unknown code. Regards
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4