2011/4/20 <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com>: > On 08:20 am, victor.stinner at haypocalc.com wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Le mardi 19 avril 2011 à 22:42 -0400, Terry Reedy a écrit : >>> >>> On 4/19/2011 5:59 PM, victor.stinner wrote: >>> >>> > Issue #11223: Add threading._info() function providing informations >>> > about the >>> > thread implementation. >>> >>> Since this is being documented, making it part of the public api, why >>> does it have a leading underscore? >> > > Can I propose something wildly radical? Maybe the guarantees made about > whether an API will be available in future versions of Python (ostensibly > what "public" vs "private" is for) should not be tightly coupled to the > decision about whether to bother to explain what an API does? With what criteria would you propose to replace it with? -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4