Hi, > We try very hard to optimize for usual python idioms. They're very > often much better than specific cpython hacks. Unless you mean things > like rebiding a global into default a "pythonic idiom". We had to > rewrite places in standard library which are precisely not very > pythonic. If I understand correctly, you’ve made internal changes preserving the official API of the modules. Have you reported those cases to bugs.python.org? I’m sure we’d be glad to incorporate those changes into the stdlib, possibly even in the stable branches if their rationale is strong enough. Regards
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4