On 17/04/2011 17:05, Michael Foord wrote: > On 17/04/2011 00:16, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:48:45 +0100 >> Michael Foord<fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 16/04/2011 22:28, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >>>> Am 16.04.2011 21:13, schrieb Vinay Sajip: >>>>> Martin v. Löwis<martin<at> v.loewis.de> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Does it actually need improvement? >>>>> I can't actually say, but I assume it keeps changing for the >>>>> better - albeit >>>>> slowly. I wasn't thinking of specific improvements, just the idea >>>>> of continuous >>>>> improvement in general... >>>> Hmm. I cannot believe in the notion of "continuous improvement"; I'd >>>> guess that it is rather "continuous change". >>>> >>>> I can see three possible areas of improvment: >>>> 1. Bugs: if there are any, they should clearly be fixed. However, JSON >>>> is a simple format, so the implementation should be able to >>>> converge >>>> to something fairly correct quickly. >>>> 2. Performance: there is always room for performance improvements. >>>> However, I strongly recommend to not bother unless a severe >>>> bottleneck can be demonstrated. >>> Well, there was a 5x speedup demonstrated comparing simplejson to the >>> standard library json module. >> No. >> > Yes. Well, maybe not. :-) > >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > > -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4