RetroSearch Browse

Sat Apr 16 16:42:38 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110766.html

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 16:19, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> What you're proposing doesn't address the question of who is going to
> do the ongoing maintenance. Bob apparently isn't interested in
> maintaining stdlib code, and python-dev members aren't interested in
> maintaining simplejson (assuming it would be at all possible). Since
> both groups of people want to work on separate codebases, I don't see
> how sharing a single codebase would be possible.

>From reading this thread, it seems to me like the proposal is that Bob
maintains a simplejson for both 2.x and 3.x and that the current
stdlib json is replaced by a (trivially changed) version of
simplejson.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110766.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpython