Sandro Tosi <sandro.tosi <at> gmail.com> writes: > Luckily, upstream is receptive for patches, so part of the job is to > forward patches written for cpython not already in the upstream code. Further to my earlier response to your post, I should mention that my fork of simplejson at https://github.com/vsajip/simplejson/ passes all 136 tests for Python 2.7 and 3.2 (not been able to test with 3.3a0 yet). No tests were skipped, though adjustments were made for binary/string literals and for one case where sorting was applied to incompatible types in the tests. Test output is at https://gist.github.com/923019 Bob - If you're reading this, what would you say to having a look at my fork, and comment on the feasibility of merging my changes back into your master? The changes are fairly easy to understand, all tests pass, and it's a 2.x/3.x single codebase, so maintenance should be easier than with multiple codebases. Admittedly I haven't looked at the C code yet, but that's next on my list. Regards, Vinay Sajip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4