A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110746.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpython

[Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpython [Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpythonAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Fri Apr 15 23:20:53 CEST 2011
Le vendredi 15 avril 2011 à 14:18 -0700, Bob Ippolito a écrit :
> On Friday, April 15, 2011, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Since the JSON spec is set in stone, the changes
> >> > will mostly be about API (indentation, object conversion, etc)
> >> > and optimization.  I presume the core parsing logic won't
> >> > be changing much.
> >>
> >> Actually the core parsing logic is very different (and MUCH faster),
> >
> > Are you talking about the Python logic or the C logic?
> 
> Both, actually. IIRC simplejson in pure python typically beats json
> with it's C extension.

Really? It would be nice to see some concrete benchmarks against both
repo tips.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4