A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110745.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpython

[Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpython [Python-Dev] Status of json (simplejson) in cpythonBob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Fri Apr 15 23:18:04 CEST 2011
On Friday, April 15, 2011, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Since the JSON spec is set in stone, the changes
>> > will mostly be about API (indentation, object conversion, etc)
>> > and optimization.  I presume the core parsing logic won't
>> > be changing much.
>>
>> Actually the core parsing logic is very different (and MUCH faster),
>
> Are you talking about the Python logic or the C logic?

Both, actually. IIRC simplejson in pure python typically beats json
with it's C extension.

-bob
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4