A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110686.html below:

[Python-Dev] python and super

[Python-Dev] python and superRicardo Kirkner ricardokirkner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 15:09:50 CEST 2011
Hi all,

I recently stumbled upon an issue with a class in the mro chain not
calling super, therefore breaking the chain (ie, further base classes
along the chain didn't get called).
I understand it is currently a requirement that all classes that are
part of the mro chain behave and always call super. My question is,
shouldn't/wouldn't it be better,
if python took ownership of that part, and ensured all classes get
called, even if some class misbehaved?

For example, if using a stack-like structure, pushing super calls and
popping until the stack was empty, couldn't this restriction be
removed?

Thanks,
Ricardo
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4