On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:04 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > As I read it, Nick's thought wasn't that distutils2 would help the OP, > but that the OP could help Distutils2 and the community by taking his > use case to the developers and making sure that that use case is > supported before the release of packaging in 3.3. A little of both, actually. (I don't know either distutils or distutils2 well enough to know precisely what the latter handles better, I just know that it is designed to be easier to extend without being as fragile as custom commands in distutils) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4