On Apr 12, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Laura Creighton wrote: >In a message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:56:32 EDT, Barry Warsaw writes: ><snip> >>The Deriving section of the PEP is not the most important part of it, and >> is >>not making specific recommendations. If it's not clear that it's only >>providing examples, or it's distracting, then maybe it's better off being >>removed, cut down or rewritten. > >To me, at any rate, it read as a pretty important part. But the version I >just read from http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0396/ still has the >re in it as well. Yep, I haven't committed or pushed the change yet. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110412/106dfe04/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4