RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 12 22:14:28 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110650.html

In a message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:56:32 EDT, Barry Warsaw writes:
<snip>
>The Deriving section of the PEP is not the most important part of it, and
> is
>not making specific recommendations.  If it's not clear that it's only
>providing examples, or it's distracting, then maybe it's better off being
>removed, cut down or rewritten.

To me, at any rate, it read as a pretty  important part.  But the version I
just read from http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0396/ still has the
re in it as well.

Laura

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110650.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 396, Module Version Numbers