On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 > Tres Seaver<tseaver at palladion.com> wrote: >>> Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test >>> the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another >>> - cython *is not* an interpreter. >>> >>> Cython is out of scope for this. >> Why is it out of scope to use the benchmarks and test harness to answer >> questions like "can we use Cython to provide optional optimizations for >> the stdlib"? I can certainly see value in havng an objective way to >> compare the macro benchmark performance of a Cython-optimized CPython >> vs. a vanilla CPython, as well as vs. PyPY, Jython, or IronPython. > Agreed. Assuming someone wants to take care of the Cython side of > things, I don't think there's any reason to exclude it under the > dubious reason that it's "not an interpreter". > (would you exclude Psyco, if it was still alive?) > Well, sure - but within the scope of a GSOC project limiting it to "core python" seems like a more realistic goal. Adding cython later shouldn't be an issue if someone is willing to do the work. All the best, Michael Foord > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4