RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 4 19:38:24 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110436.html

On 04/04/2011 18:05, fwierzbicki at gmail.com wrote:
> As a re-implementor of ast.py that tries to be node for node
> compatible, I'm fine with #1 but would really like to have tests that
> will fail in test_ast.py to alert me!
>

A lot of tools that work with Python source code use ast - so even 
though other implementations may not use the same ast "under the hood" 
they will probably at least *want* to provide a compatible 
implementation. IronPython is in that boat too (although I don't know if 
we *have* a compatible implementation yet - we certainly feel like we 
*should* have one).

Michael

> -Frank
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk

-- 
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110436.html below:

[Python-Dev] Policy for making changes to the AST