On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:55:33 +0200 > Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote: >> I think we use Misc/ACKS for code+docs contribution like this one, >> Doc/ACKS.txt being used for doc-only changes. This second file is not >> comprehensive nor always used though, so maybe it should be superseded >> by the former. > > Nadeem is already in Misc/ACKS. I don't know what the policy is for > Doc/ACKS.txt, but since he added himself in the patch, I saw no good > reason for reverting the change. I added myself because I assumed the policy for Doc/ACKS.txt to be the same as the policy for Misc/ACKS - if you submit a patch, add your name. Looking at the devguide, though, I can't find any mention of Doc/ACKS.txt. > +1 for merging these files by the way. Sounds good to me. The intro at the top of Misc/ACKS is pretty broad, thanking people for all contributions (not just code). Unless there's some plan to split the documentation off into a separate repository, I can't think of any reason not to merge them. Regards, Nadeem
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4