Am 01.04.2011 18:31, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:39:59 +0200 > Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: >> Am 01.04.2011 14:49, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: >> > On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:37:42 +0100 >> > Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> >> > I think I was unclear: I'm not advocating doing doc fixes in security-only >> >> > branches; I'm just explaining why it wouldn't even make sense to do these >> >> > fixes. >> >> > >> >> I understood. I was suggesting we modify to allow doc changes that fix >> >> errors and push updated docs *online* (not do fresh releases) and asking >> >> why not do that (other than policy)? >> > >> > Well, I think the tradeoff is simply: do you want to do more work? >> > (or, given the same amount of work, do you think allocating your >> > workforce to backporting doc fixes is worthwhile?) >> >> Absolutely. I don't want to maintain that infrastructure. > > But perhaps Michael would like to maintain it? He could be given an > account on dinsdale if he wants to. I seriously doubt that Michael would like to resurrect the old tex2html toolchain, and personally I also think that there are much better things he can do with his volunteer time... Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4