RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 1 18:30:14 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110366.html

On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:17:27 -0400
Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I know what I said before but I really am still on the fence about
> non-behavior changing fixes.  Both sides have valid positions, IMO. :/

Well, how can you be sure it's non-behaviour changing? A bugfix can
always introduce a regression.

> However, because of the hg forward porting policy, I would like to decide
> asap on how far back to port the fix.  As I see it, the patch is
> uncontroversial for 3.3, 3.2, and 2.7.  And it definitely will not be applied
> to 3.0.  That leaves 2.5, 2.6, and 3.1.

I think it's Martin who ultimately decides what goes into 2.5. He
seemed quite conservative about it.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110366.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issue 11715: building Python from source on multiarch Debian/Ubuntu