On Apr 01, 2011, at 08:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote: >> If I understand the policy correctly, 2.5 and 2.6 are not considered >> active branches, so any doc, build or bug fixes are not acceptable. > >Actual build fixes may be acceptable, if they're needed to allow >people to build from a version control checkout or from source (since >they need to be able to do that in order to apply security patches). > >However, the combination of "running on Ubuntu 11.04+" and "need to >build security patched version of old Python" seems unlikely. I'll just plead as RM for 2.6 that it's not as unlikely as it seems :). I'm happy to defer to MvL on its (non) applicability to 2.5. Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110331/b77add3f/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4