RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 30 17:51:07 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104353.html

Am 30.09.2010 17:40, schrieb Senthil Kumaran:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>     Of course, this is only true if the core developers *do* submit to the same
>>     rules.  Is anyone proposing that current core committers have all their
>>     work reviewed before it is accepted?
> 
> For large patches it is good idea. But enforcing it for smaller
> patches may cost us more time for each commit.

I think the supporters of code review readily accept that: in return
for the higher effort, they say, we also get more quality.

So it's really a quality vs. quantity thing. It would be easy to just
commit all patches that are uploaded to roundup, but of course, it
would horribly break Python. With mandatory code review, even less
patches get reviewed than today.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104353.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews