A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104351.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviewsSenthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 17:40:17 CEST 2010
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> 
>     Of course, this is only true if the core developers *do* submit to the same
>     rules.  Is anyone proposing that current core committers have all their
>     work reviewed before it is accepted?

For large patches it is good idea. But enforcing it for smaller
patches may cost us more time for each commit.


-- 
Senthil

Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
                -- Rich Kulawiec
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4