Barry Warsaw writes: > You can have "co-located" branches[1] which essentially switch > in-place, so if a branch is changing some .c files, you won't have > to rebuild the whole world just to try out a patch. In Mercurial these are called "named branches", and they are repo-local (by which I mean they must be part of the DAG). Named branches used to have some inconvenient aspects relevant to standalone branches (they could be fairly confusing to other users if pushed before being merge to mainline). It's not obvious to me that Mercurial style named branches would work well here ... it would take a little thought to design an appropriate workflow, anyway.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4