A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104315.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviewsBrett Cannon bcannon at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 00:11:50 CEST 2010
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 14:58, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> That shouldn't be too hard. Someone just has to create an App Engine
>> project and handle the deployment. I guess the trickiest part is
>> making sure enough people have admin access so multiple people can
>> update the website, especially if we run a modified copy so that
>> bugs.python.org can push "anonymous" (and probably be the only thing
>> that can).
>
> I was hoping that I can run Rietveld on the same machine as roundup,
> with the added advantage that people can use the same logins, and
> even the same cookies.

If it can work that sure then great. I just don't know what it takes
to run Rietveld sans App Engine.

-Brett

>
> Of course, we could do an OpenID-style indirect communication,
> referring people to Roundup when they need to be authenticated to
> Rietveld (in particular when commenting).
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4