A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104312.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviewsBenjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Thu Sep 30 00:01:51 CEST 2010
2010/9/29 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> How often do we even get patches generated from a downloaded copy of
>> Python? Is it enough to need to worry about this?
>
> I used to get these frequently. I don't know what the experience of
> the current crop of core developers is though, so maybe my gut
> feelings here are outdated.

FWIW, I usually don't apply patches until the last stages of review
(namely I'm going to apply it). So, it's a little annoying to download
and apply a patch just to run upload.py. I'd prefer a pure web
interface for starting reviews with a code review tool.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4