A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104291.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviewsPaul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Wed Sep 29 22:59:35 CEST 2010
On 29 September 2010 21:12, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> How often do we even get patches generated from a downloaded copy of
> Python? Is it enough to need to worry about this?

When I do simple bugfixes of library code, I'll often work from my
"live" Python environment, patch it in place, test and generate a
patch with diff. Very primitive, but surprisingly effective.

Having said that, I don't think it's the end of the world if such
patches couldn't use Reitveld. They are probably small enough that it
would be overkill anyway.

Paul
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4