On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:13, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > I see that Atlassian have just taken over BitBucket, the Mercurial > hosting company. IIRC Atlassian offered to host our issue tracking on > JIRA, but in the end we decided to eat our own dog food and went with > roundup. > > I'm wondering if they'd be similarly interested in supporting our Hg > server. Or is self-hosting the only acceptable solution? From recent > mail it looks likes we may be up and running on Hg fairly soon. Don't know about acceptable, but as far as I know hosting Mercurial repositories doesn't require as much work as hosting Roundup instances (which the Mercurial project also has). I wouldn't mind maintaining hg.python.org, and there are probably other devs that could also easily get involved. Anyway, I don't think using Bitbucket buys us much. It could be nice to keep a mirror there for redundancy and because it might make contributing slightly easier for non-committers, but it won't allow doing all kinds of custom hooks the way we could do with hg.p.o, AFAICT. Cheers, Dirkjan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4