> I certainly wouldn't be opposed to an API that accepts a string as well > though. Notice that this can't really work for Python 2 source code (but of course, it doesn't need to). In Python 2, if you have a string literal in the source code, you need to know the source encoding in order to get the bytes *back*. Now, if you parse a Unicode string as source code, and it contains byte string literals, you wouldn't know what encoding to apply. Fortunately, Python 3 byte literals ban non-ASCII literal characters, so assuming an ASCII-compatible encoding for the original source is fairly safe. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4