On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:25:17 -0400 Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > .. > > If so, then I say in hg, nuke the tags we don't care about and sanitize the > > release tags to something that obvious and can't collide (e.g. r311 is 3.1.1 > > or 3.11? - yes despite Guido's Rule of Version Numbering). I'd personally be > > fine using the hexversion or even "3.1.1" as the tag name. > > > > +1 > > Apart from being ambiguous, rXYZ notation conflicts with the tracker > autoformat rule that links rNNN to svn revision. And also, given that many hg commands can be specified a tag name using "-rXXX", having to write "-rr311" would be a bit awkward.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4