> I guess a better example would be > > old: > open #1 #2 > closed #3 > new: > open #1 > closed #2 #3 #4 #5 > > which results in +2 for open (since #4 and #5 were opened) and +3 for closed > (since #2, #4 and #5 were closed), however the total issue delta is +2. This > is why I think these numbers should be labeled "openings" and "closings". I *have* looked at the code, any I'm certain that this is not how the computation goes. Instead, I'm also certain that it goes as in the message I sent. Notice that it prints the numbers I put into parentheses (+2, +1), and they do *not* sum up to +1. The numbers I posted as "delta would be" are not currently included in the report. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4