> > But we also have "performance", "crash", "resource usage"... Are we > > suggesting we devise a separate list box for each of these issue types? > > I must admit, I've never actually found much use for those additional > options. If I'm flagging a bug I'll nearly always mark it "behaviour", > otherwise I'll mark the issue "feature request". The characterisation > of "what *kind* of bug is it?" is something that can usually be left > until later in the process. I have often used searches on "performance" or "resource usage" to find what was needing a review or a patch. I think it would be a mistake to remove those two categories. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4