"Martin v. Löwis" writes: > I didn't say the field does not matter. I said adjusting it doesn't > advance the issue. Anybody *really* working on the issue might > choose to update it, or might choose to leave it incorrect when the > issue is going to be closed, anyway. Yes, and we'd all like more people to do more "real" work. But not everybody has the time or skills. I think this is a case where "agreeing to disagree" is the best we can do. Specifically, Terry has made a strong case that "a few minutes per issue" *can* improve the tracker in ways that *are* noticable to some of the developers (and some of them have acknowledged that). It would be nice if the "tracker trimmers"[1] could assemble 60 of those into a few hours, and do some "real work", but that's often just not possible (especially for people with minimal programming expertise as yet). Footnotes: [1] Trawlers take fish out of the ocean: not really the best metaphor. Gardening is a better metaphor.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4