On 9/23/2010 3:50 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: > ISTM that the "versions" field is not very useful if the other fields are > filled accurately. > > For example, feature requests almost always only belong to the current trunk. > Yes, for features that fall under the moratorium, the "versions" field would > be different; however, we already have an "after moratorium" keyword that > signifies this. Other than this, we currently don't assign feature requests > to specific milestones, and I don't ever see us doing that. > > Bug reports by nature almost always belong to all branches in maintenance; For various reasons, there bugs that are 2.x or 3.x specific. Those that are not may require sufficiently different fixes that a fix is applied for one branch while the issue is left open for the other. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4