On 9/23/2010 8:11 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> make sure the issue is assigned to the right person if appropriate > > -1. We typically don't assign issues to others. What I and Mark (that I know of) did in that respect was to assign doc issues, including old issues reclassified as doc issues, to docs at python. > >> add relevant keywords to make it easier to find in searches > > -0. Going through old issues just to make sure the keywords are right > seems wasteful. >> ensure other fields in the tracker are filled in correctly > > Likewise. I am guessing that you have never done professional database management. And I suspect you would not be temperamentally suited to such. To repeat what I said in another post, if it does not matter how a field is set, it should not be there. You seem really antagonistic to, or at least dismissive of, people who contribute in ways other than how you do. That strikes me as unhelpful. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4