On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:29:23 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > Guido van Rossum writes: > > > I would recommend that in the future more attention is paid to > > "documenting" publicly that someone's being booted out was > > inevitable, by an exchange of messages on python-dev (or > > python-committers if we want to limit distribution). And no, I > > don't think that IRC (where I suspect this happened) is sufficient. > > +1 on explaining "what" and "why" where the committers can see it, and > +1 on limiting distribution. > > The one time I lifted someone's privileges that's the way I did it (by > luck, mostly). In hindsight, the fact that it was all done in plain > sight of the committers made it easy for us to put the incident behind > us. The fact that it was only visible to the committers made it > easier mend the relationship later. I guess python-committers would have been the best recipient indeed. Sorry for that. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4