RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 21 19:10:27 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/103887.html

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> After all, even if PEP 333 is ultimately replaced by PEP 444, it's probably
> a good idea to have *some* sort of WSGI 1-ish thing available on Python 3,
> with bytes/unicode and other matters settled.

Indeed.

Though I generally like the direction that PEP 444 is going in, I know
that writing specs is *HARD*. I think having something that works on
Python 3 in time for the 3.2 release is a much bigger deal than having
an WSGI2 (or whatever) done.

This is classic "the perfect is the enemy of the good" territory.
Let's get "the good" done and *then* spend time working on "the
perfect".

Jacob

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/103887.html below:

WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3