RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 21 18:55:15 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/103884.html

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Chris McDonough <chrism at plope.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote:
> > While the Web-SIG is trying to hash out PEP 444, I thought it would
> > be a good idea to have a backup plan that would allow the Python 3
> > stdlib to move forward, without needing a major new spec to settle
> > out implementation questions.
>
> If a WSGI-1-compatible protocol seems more sensible to folks, I'm
> personally happy to defer discussion on PEP 444 or any other
> backwards-incompatible proposal.
>

I think both make sense, making WSGI 1 sensible for Python 3 (as well as
other small errata like the size hint) doesn't detract from PEP 444 at all,
IMHO.

-- 
Ian Bicking  |  http://blog.ianbicking.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100921/619fb0c2/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/103884.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] Backup plan: WSGI 1 Addenda and wsgiref update for Py3