> I only mandated ./configure-based builds to be PEP 3149 conforming. I have no > objection to expanding the PEP to include Windows builds, but I'm not sure > it's necessary and it would take a Windows build expert to make and test those > changes. > > Does PEP 3149 have any advantage for Windows installations? I think this is resolved by now, responding anyway: I don't see any immediate advantage. The problem that the PEP addresses typically doesn't exist on Windows. >> 2. Why does the PEP recommend installing stuff >> into /usr/share/pyshared? > > It's just a suggestion, but as it turns out, probably an incorrect one. I'll > rephrase this to make it clear that it's up to the distribution as to where > exactly these files get installed. Nothing about this PEP changes the default > from-source installation directory. Is the rephrasing done already? I still wonder why you suggest /usr/share should be used, when the FHS says it should be /usr/lib. This keeps confusing me, despite not being part of the specification. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4