On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:12:28AM -0700, geremy condra wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz > > Let's take PyPI numbers as a proxy. There are ~8000 packages with a > > "Programming Language::Python" classifier. There are ~250 with "Programming > > Langauge::Python::3". Roughly speaking, we can say that is 3% of Python > > code which has been ported so far. Python 3.0 was released at the end of > > 2008, so people have had roughly 2 years to port, which comes up with 1.5% > > per year. > Just my two cents: > Just one further informational note about using pypi in this way for statistics... In the porting work we've done within Fedora, I've noticed that a lot of packages are python3 ready or even officially support python3 but the language classifier on pypi does not reflect this. Here's just a few since I looked them up when working on the python porting wiki pages: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Beaker/ http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pycairo http://pypi.python.org/pypi/docutils -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101029/359b7038/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4