On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:55:55 -0400 Glyph Lefkowitz <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > > Let's say that 20% of the code on PyPI is just junk; > it's unfair to expect 100% of all code ever to get ported. But, still: > with this back-of-the-envelope estimate of the rate of porting, it will > take over 50 years before a decisive majority of Python code is on > Python 3. Well, no. A decisive majority would be much smaller than that. There are probably between 2% and 5% of the CheeseShop entries which are widely used dependencies. When these 2 to 5% all get ported, you have a decisive majority. Yes, perhaps more than 50% of 2.x code will never get ported. But, perhaps more than 50% of 1.5.2 code never got upgraded either. That doesn't make it any decisive; just dead (or pining for security fixes in some old rusty "RedHat Enterprise Linux" server, if you prefer). > Right now, Kristján is burning off his (non-fungible) enthusiasm > in this discussion rather than addressing more 2.x maintenance issues. By the same argument, we are also burning off our (non-fungible) enthusiasm trying to answer people like you and Kristján. Perhaps we should stop answering you and instead concentrate on improving 3.x? ;) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4