> (and, believe me, not having to backport new 3.x features to the 2.x > branch makes our work much easier than it was; people generally seem > to underestimate the amount of care needed for such things, especially > in areas where 2.x is significantly more complex - old-style classes, > two parallel buffer APIs, misleading implicit conversions...) I completely agree with that point. I find it unlikely that those who do regular maintenance of Python will join a continuing-2.x effort. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4