On Oct 28, 2010, at 04:07 PM, lutz at rmi.net wrote: >I hope 3.X use expands; in fact, I've bet the future of at >least one book on it. And even 1/4 of new users seems a >large enough subset to care about too. But one can't help >but wonder if most of the development community is focused >on some imaginary future user base, at the expense of the >much larger current user base. Then again, there's still >plenty of Fortran77 code out there, so... Python 2 will live on for a long time. Other than promising to bug-fix maintain Python 2.7 for much longer than usual, which we've already done, what specifically should we do? A no-new-feature Python 2.8 doesn't make sense, and I'm not convinced that a new-feature Python 2.8 really helps folks who are stuck on Python 2 for whatever reason. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101028/d5c2c049/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4