Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104903.html below:

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
• Next message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Michael Foord
<fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> I find the big-ball-of-mud style development, where everything lives inside
> huge monolithic modules, very painful. I also think that it is an extremely
> bad example for new developers.

Gadzooks, Michael!  Something else we agree on.  2000-line modules are
a source of maintenance pain.


  -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at acm.org>
"A storm broke loose in my mind."  --Albert Einstein

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
• Next message: [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4