On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:41:09 -0500 Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > 2010/10/22 <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com>: > > Instances of classes don't refer to the module their class is defined in. > > It seems more likely that the reason the module is garbage collected is > > that there really is nothing which refers to it anymore. > > Indeed, this is really a Python bug, but there's no good way to deal > with it unless dictionaries can know they are module globals. How about making functions keep a reference to the module they're defined in? Is there any reason we shouldn't do that? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4