RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 14 20:38:38 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104700.html

2010/10/14 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>:
> Am 14.10.2010 19:57, schrieb Daniel Stutzbach:
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, barry.warsaw
>> <python-checkins at python.org <mailto:python-checkins at python.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     -# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65 for python 3.2.
>>     +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.67 for python 3.2.
>>
>>
>> Was the change in autoconf versions intentional and/or is it a problem?
>
> I think it was intentional (at least deliberate), but I think it is a
> problem and should be reverted. There is, at any point, the official
> version that Python uses for autoconf, which at the moment is 2.65.
> The rationale is that with changing autoconf versions, the actual
> configure script will change forth and back, confusing attributions
> (svn blame).

Why would anyone annotate configure? configure.in is stable wrt to
autoconf versions.

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104700.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r85486 - python/branches/py3k/configure