2010/10/10 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > Personnally, I'm not convinced that a maximum 25% improvement on a > rather uncommon use case (min() and max() on a sequence of objects > which take a long time to compare) is a compelling argument for a > builtin. On the other hand, it would be a rather simple and intuitive > builtin, so why not? Because new builtins should have a better reason that there's no good reason not to. :) -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4