A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104520.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rietveld integration into Roundup

[Python-Dev] Rietveld integration into Roundup [Python-Dev] Rietveld integration into RoundupAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Oct 7 23:10:06 CEST 2010
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:04:54 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> 
> However, if I get something like
> 
> diff -r e981b6cc56b0 Include/longintrepr.h
> --- a/Include/longintrepr.h	Thu Oct 07 03:12:19 2010 +0200
> +++ b/Include/longintrepr.h	Thu Oct 07 13:53:41 2010 +0200
> 
> I have no clue where I should look for the base revision
> that the patch was created against.

As I said, most patches are supposed to be produced against py3k HEAD,
so you could try just that as the primary heuristic.

I think you may trying too hard to find smart ways of inferring the
correct svn rev and branch, while developing against latest py3k is,
most of the time, the required standard. Outdated patches are not
really helpful anyway.

Regards

Antoine.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4