RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 5 23:12:31 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104483.html

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> I guess somebody would need to do monitoring on them, and ping operators
> if the buildbot is down for an extended period of time. Feel free to ping
> any operator whenever you notice that a slave is down (they do get
> an automated email, but people can get resistant to automated emails).
>
> Also, if you would want to propose that a different set than the current
> ones should be considered stable, please let me know. I believe
> "stable" was meant in a different way, though - it would reliably pass all
> tests, and a test failure should be considered a bug, rather than
> some random failure on the slave.

To simplify the task of contacting buildbot operators, would it be
worth having a "python-buildbot-owners" mailing list?

Regards,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104483.html below:

[Python-Dev] stable builders